Prevalence, knowledge-attitude-practice, burnout, satisfaction, screening, designed, powered, analysed, and written by us; the data collected by you.
What it is
A cross-sectional study measures a population at one point in time, how common a condition, behaviour, or attitude is, and what it is associated with. It is the most accessible original study for a clinician: no follow-up, no intervention, often no more than a validated questionnaire and access to patients or colleagues. What separates a citable one from a rejected one is the design: a justified sample size, a validated instrument, a sampling plan that avoids bias, and an analysis that goes beyond percentages.
What it is built for
You provide, access to the patients, staff, or students, and the data collection using the tool we build.
We provide, the question, protocol, ethics package, validated questionnaire or CRF, sample size, analysis, manuscript, and submission.
Designs, prevalence and descriptive surveys, KAP studies, diagnostic yield, associations with regression.
How it works
Population, outcome, exposures
Validated questionnaire or CRF
Powered, bias-aware plan
Paper, REDCap, or online form
Weighted estimates, regression
STROBE / CROSS checklists
How you benefit
The project, step by step
We turn your idea into a measurable prevalence or association question.
Protocol, sample size, validated questionnaire or CRF, and the IRB package.
With the form we build. REDCap, online, or paper, and a short training call.
Cleaning, descriptive estimates, and regression, in reproducible code.
STROBE-reported paper drafted with you, formatted to the target journal.
Journal shortlist, submission package, and reviewer responses to a decision.
Published examples
Independent, peer-reviewed examples of what this route can produce.
Shanafelt TD, et al. · 2015
A questionnaire-based survey of 6,880 US physicians that became the reference point for physician-burnout research.
View in journal →Ford ES, et al. · 2002
Cross-sectional analysis of NHANES III, one of the most-cited prevalence estimates in medicine.
View in journal →Mokdad AH, et al. · 2003
A telephone survey of 195,005 adults showing how a well-designed cross-sectional study shapes public-health policy.
View in journal →These are independent published studies, shown to illustrate the route, they are not Cohira's work.
Pricing
Per project, never per author. You collect the data with the tool we design; everything else is included. Journal fees are billed at cost. Your week-by-week timeline is written into the free feasibility note before you pay. Booking more than one study? 10% off the second, 15% off from the third. Acceptance Guarantee & group pricing →
Start a conversation
Tell us the group and the question. You get a free feasibility note, design, sample size, and realistic journals, before you commit.