Hospital records, a departmental registry, a completed trial, an audit, data you already hold, turned into a publishable study.
What it is
Most departments sit on years of clinical data that never becomes a publication: records that were never extracted cleanly, a registry nobody analysed, a trial dataset with one paper written and three left in it. We design a retrospective cohort, case-control, or registry study around what you hold, clean and harmonise it, run the pre-specified analysis, and write the paper to STROBE or RECORD.
What it is built for
You provide, the dataset (anonymised) or access to extract it, ethics approval, and the clinical judgement.
We provide, study design, data dictionary and cleaning, analysis with reproducible code, manuscript, and submission.
Your data, NDA and data-processing agreement signed before anything moves, transfer by secure link only (never WhatsApp or email), encrypted storage, deletion at project close on request.
Designs, retrospective cohorts, case-control, registry analyses, secondary analyses of trial data, prognostic factor studies.
How it works
What is there, what is usable
Cohort, case-control, or registry
Dictionary, exclusions, missingness
Regression, survival, matching
Checks reviewers expect
STROBE / RECORD, with code
How you benefit
The project, step by step
Send a description or a sample; we say what it can support.
Design, outcomes, covariates, and a pre-specified analysis plan.
A data dictionary, an exclusion log, and a dataset that can be re-used.
Regression, survival, or matched analyses in reproducible code, with sensitivity checks.
Drafted with you to STROBE or RECORD, formatted to the target journal.
Journal shortlist, submission package, and reviewer responses to a decision.
Published examples
Independent, peer-reviewed examples of what this route can produce.
Gupta S, et al. · 2021
A multicentre records-based cohort comparing treated and untreated patients with target-trial methods.
View in journal →Zhou F, et al. · 2020
A two-hospital retrospective cohort of 191 patients, small data, rigorous design, landmark impact.
View in journal →Richardson S, et al. · 2020
A single health-system record review that became one of the most-cited clinical papers of the pandemic.
View in journal →Goyal P, et al. · 2020
A retrospective review of 393 consecutive patients from institutional records, published as a research letter.
View in journal →These are independent published studies, shown to illustrate the route, they are not Cohira's work.
Pricing
Per project, never per author. Raw exports needing heavy cleaning and harmonisation are scoped in the feasibility note. Your week-by-week timeline is written into the free feasibility note before you pay. Booking more than one study? 10% off the second, 15% off from the third. Acceptance Guarantee & group pricing →
Start a conversation
Describe what you hold. You get a free feasibility note, what the data can support and where it could publish, before you commit.